People who skim through engineering reddit11/30/2023 All users are expected to behave with courtesy. Note that questions must still be specific to engineering and not a general opinion survey.īe respectful to other users. Mechanical, Electrical, Civil, Chemical, and Computer are reserved for technical questions only.ĭiscussion can be used for general questions that apply to multiple disciplines, including some workplace topics. Review the wiki prior to posting.Īvoid questions that can easily be answered by searching on the internet.Īvoid questions that have already be answered by a post in the FAQ section of the wiki. Most general career related questions should be placed in the Monday Career Megathread. Post titles must be a question about engineering and provide context - be specific. If teachers gave students something with bulk, they'd be more likely to slow down.Call for Engineers: Tell us about your job! (2020) New to AskEngineers? Read our subreddit rules and FAQ page before posting! Topic Filters To put it succinctly? Of course people will read quickly when they're getting quick snippets of information and when there is relatively little depth to what they're reading. And, if I ever came across an online version of Being and Time, I'm likely to actually read it. ![]() Sure, one might be able to psychoanalyze my comment and deduce something from that, but it doesn't add to the meaning of my post. There isn't a hidden message that will reveal itself through semiotics or deconstruction. Why the hell would anyone pour over my little reddit comment? I didn't make any profound allusions or complex metaphors. But, the internet wins in terms of convenience.Īs for his condemnation of a quick read? Come on. So can a more academic source, if I look in the index along with the table of contents and try to deduce where the size of the earth might come up. How big is the earth, you ask? Well, google can tell me! So can wikipedia!! So can a textbook, if I search the table of contents. I think the internet is excellent for this kind of reading, and for transferring a quick idea without much trouble. I just steal the necessary piece of information from them. The same is true when doing research on a subject: some sources I never really read. I try to get the piece of information I need and I move on. At least not in the same way I read a philosophical treatise, historical representation or mathematical paper. If there's another reason, please correct me.īut, this leads into another point: I don't read text books. But the true value there-in is having a grasp on the meaning of the poem. I can see the value of being able to recall a particularly meaningful line or verse at a moment's notice (perhaps as a particularly witty quip or meaningful metaphor). So many free deliveries through the screen had sapped that initiative. Checking a reference book, asking a librarian, and finding a microfiche didn't occur to them. Besides, if you can call up the verse any time with a click, why remember it? Last year when I required students in a literature survey course to obtain obituaries of famous writers without using the Internet, they stared in confusion. Canny and quick, she judged the plodding process of recording others' words a primitive exercise. She just didn't see any purpose or value in the task. ![]() In an "Introduction to Poetry" class awhile back, when I asked students to memorize 20 lines of verse and recite them to the others at the next meeting, a voice blurted, "Why?" The student wasn't being impudent or sullen. New to reddit? Click here! Get flair in /r/science Previous Science AMA'sĪnd we wouldn't see even the better students struggling with "slow reading" tasks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |